Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ladyman v. Meade
as 1:2014cv01148
Plaintiff:
Craig C. Ladyman
Defendant:
Nicholas Meade, Ted Bohner, Arthur Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Snyder et al
as 1:2013cv00351
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Daniel H. Heyns, Jane Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #324642 v. Beak et al
as 2:2012cv00205
Plaintiff:
Corielle Johnson #324642
Defendant:
Leslie Beak, Daniel Heyns, Unknown Curley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White #198559 v. Berrios
as 2:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
Brian White #198559
Defendant:
Miguel Berrios, Ted Hammon and Elizabeth Clement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Michigan Parole Board, et al
as 2:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board and Ted Hammon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Alger Maximum Correctional Facility, et al
as 2:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Alger Maximum Correctional Facility, Catherine Bauman, Unknown Rutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter #229916 v. Hammon, et al
as 2:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Carl Hunter #229916
Defendant:
Ted Hammon, Michigan Department of Corrections Parole and Pardon Commutation Board, People of the State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers #095405 v. Granholm et al
as 1:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Floyd Chambers #095405
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Granholm, James Atterberry, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langdon v. Skelding et al
as 1:2010cv00985
Plaintiff:
Susan Langdon
Defendant:
Patricia Skelding, Cynthia Bare, Marianna Udow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
