Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Stokes v. Veyo Cab Company et al
as 2:2018cv00655
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Stokes
Defendant:
Veyo Cab Company, YMCA, United Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dansby v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv04648
Plaintiff:
Trent Derrell Dansby
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Tempe Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. McManus et al
as 2:2016cv04301
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
M McManus, Tempe Police Department, William G Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jimenez et al
as 2:2016cv04267
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
A Jimenez and Tempe Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2016cv00836
Plaintiff:
Prentice Williams
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Tempe Police Department, Jonathon Seal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sholes v. Tempe Police Department
as 2:2014cv02515
Plaintiff:
Wendy D Sholes
Defendant:
Tempe Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sholes v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2014cv02477
Plaintiff:
Wendy D Sholes
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Tempe Police Department and Phoenix Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley, et al v. Miller et al
as 2:2014cv01956
Plaintiff:
Telly Onturio Beasley and Katrina Yvonne Johnson
Defendant:
Mike Miller, Pablo Guzman, Jason Papke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dansby v. Tempe Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv01817
Plaintiff:
Trent Dansby
Defendant:
Tempe Police Department, Phoenix Police Department, Tempe Municipal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2014cv01597
Plaintiff:
Prentice Williams
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Tempe Police Department, Luke Trader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
