Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 293
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6055
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bennett v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2022cv00051
Plaintiff: Matthew David Bennett
Defendant: Bedford County, Tennessee, Chad Graham, Tennessee State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00794
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wade v. State of Tennessee
as 4:2022cv00043
Petitioner: Marcus Thurman Wade
Respondent: Tennessee State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00619
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX of Education Amendment of 1972
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2022cv02442
Plaintiff: Wendolyn Lee
Defendant: Floyd Bonner and Tennessee State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. West Tennessee State Prison
as 3:2022cv00492
Petitioner: William Carter King
Respondent: West Tennessee State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Walls et al
as 2:2022cv02405
Plaintiff: Quantel Taylor
Defendant: C.O. Walls, C.O. Marry and West Tennessee State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Fitz, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02355
Plaintiff: Shernaye Johnson
Defendant: Johnny Fitz, Unknown Officers and West Tennessee State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sims v. Tennessee, State of
as 3:2022cv00284
Petitioner: Ronnie D. Sims, Jr.
Respondent: Tennessee, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?