Cases 1 - 10 of 320
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 4:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
TAVARRES HENDERSON and JUHIIV ALI MUHAMMIED
Respondent:
TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD, et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD and TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND et al v. DUPREE et al
as 5:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE REDMOND and JENNIFER THOMAS
Defendant:
ANTHONY DUPREE, CHRISTIAN MAKALIN TURNER, GARY LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENDERSON v. BERNARD et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TAVERRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
TERRY E BERNARD and GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNIS v. BARNARD et al
as 7:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DENNIS
Defendant:
TERRY E BARNARD, JACQUELINE BUNN, DAVID HERRING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATTLE v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00487
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE BATTLE
Respondent:
CHARLES M MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
TERRY PETERSON
Defendant:
SANOFI-AVENTIS US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TERRY v. THOMPSON et al
as 4:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
KEITH TERRY
Defendant:
MARIO JERMAINE THOMPSON, GFA ALABAMA INC and ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
SECKINGER v. BARNARD
as 5:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
JAMES SECKINGER
Defendant:
CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. BERNARD
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
WILLARD FRANK WHITE
Defendant:
TERRY E BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
