Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 275
Ligidakis v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00674
Petitioner: Joseph Nicholas Ligidakis
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gant v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00676
Petitioner: Eltorna Gant
Respondent: Charles Ryan and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parkes v. Mohave County, Arizona et al
as 2:2010cv00368
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Terry Goddard and Mohave County, Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maisano v. Robertson et al
as 4:2010cv00162
Plaintiff: Dale Maisano
Defendant: David W Robertson, Terry Goddard, Charles Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maisano v. Robertson et al
as 4:2010cv00155
Plaintiff: Dale Maisano
Defendant: David Webere Robertson, Unknown Market, Charles Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deals v. Goddard et al
as 2:2010cv00556
Plaintiff: Robert Deals
Defendant: Terry Goddard, D Mathew Conti and Robert Dossey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PULTE HOMES, INC. et al v. GODDARD et al
as 1:2010cv00377
Plaintiff: PULTE HOMES, INC. , PULTE HOME CORPORATION and PULTE MORTGAGE LLC
Defendant: TERRY GODDARD and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning v. Ryan et al
as 4:2010cv00137
Petitioner: Leonard L Manning
Respondent: Charles Ryan and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keith Stokes v. Terry Goddard, et al
as 10-15302
Petitioner - Appellant: KEITH R. STOKES
Respondent - Appellee: TERRY GODDARD, STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, CHARLES L. RYAN and others
Abelardo Chaparro v. Ivan Bartos, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-15295
Petitioner - Appellant: ABELARDO CHAPARRO
Respondent - Appellee: IVAN BARTOS and TERRY GODDARD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?