Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cawthorn v. Circosta et al
as 5:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Madison Cawthorn
Defendant:
DAMON CIRCOSTA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE NC BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JEFF CARMON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Interested Party:
Barbara Lynn Amalfi, Laurel Ashton, Natalie Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shinaberry v. Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 2:17-CV-7-F.
as 4:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Shinaberry
Defendant:
Town of Murfreesboro, N.C., Bobbie J Barmer, Michael P Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shinaberry v. Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. et al
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Shinaberry
Defendant:
Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. , Bobbie J Barmer, Michael P Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Buck v. USA
as 4:2014cv00009
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Buck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mobile Modular Management Corporation v. Modular Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00125
Plaintiff:
Mobile Modular Management Corporation
Defendant:
Modular Technologies, Inc. and Terry Lee Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thorne et al v. Jones et al
as 5:2011ct03054
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Thorne and Michael L. Green
Defendant:
Robert G. Jones, Cindy Moore-Hoskins, Clifford Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. Crews et al
as 5:2007ct03139
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Thorne
Defendant:
S.C. Crews and William Darnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thorne v. Beck
as 5:2007hc02047
Petitioner:
Terry Lee Thorne
Respondent:
Rick Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
