Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Tingle v. St. Clair County, Alabama et al
as 4:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Pell City, Alabama, Terry Surles, QCHC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jason B Tingle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Watson et al
as 4:2018cv01449
Defendant:
Mark Hooks, Terry Surles and Greg Watson
Plaintiff:
Charla Lynn Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McInturff v. St. Clair County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2018cv00730
Plaintiff:
Walker Henderson B. McInturff
Defendant:
St. Clair County Sheriff Department and Terry Surles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Honeycutt v. St. Clair Jail Administration et al
as 4:2018cv00180
Plaintiff:
Cortez Evans Honeycutt
Defendant:
St. Clair Jail Administration, Bishop, Greg Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. Butler et al
as 4:2017cv00690
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ray Wilkerson
Defendant:
Pam Butler, Annette Manning, Terry Surles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Large v. Surles et al
as 4:2014cv00996
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Large
Defendant:
Terry Surles and Debbie Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Large v. Surles et al
as 3:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Large
Defendant:
Terry Surles and Debbie Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01056
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Brown
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Inc., Jennifer Hairsine, Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Dwana Voncia London Richardson et al v. Surles et al
as 4:2013cv00927
Defendant:
Terry Surles, Austin Nash, Terry Marcrum and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Dwana Voncia London Richardson and Ayunna Johnae London
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
