Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Carrie Cox, et al v. Anthony Ruckel, et al
as 23-5698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARRIE COX and GUY MEADE
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY TODD RUCKEL, TERRI THOMAS, JONATHAN SHANE WALLINGFORD and others
Robinson et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2023cv03773
Plaintiff:
Terry Robinson, Mandingo Cain, Amadeo Garcia and others
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Tammany Brooks, Tony Morefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
D.B., et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 22-56065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D.B. and D.C.B., by and through their Guardian Ad Litem, Terri Thomas, and as successors in interest to the ESTATE OF DARREN BURLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DAVID AVILES, Deputy and DOES, 1-10, Inclusive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Cox et al v. Ruckel et al
as 2:2020cv00141
Plaintiff:
Guy Meade and Carrie Cox
Defendant:
Terri Thomas, Amy Kennedy, Jonathan Shane Wallingford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox et al v. Ruckel et al
as 0:2020cv00120
Plaintiff:
Guy Meade and Carrie Cox
Defendant:
Terri Thomas, Amy Kennedy, Jonathan Shane Wallingford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00663
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-6346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
