Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,240
MANTALIS v. AUROBINDO PHARM, LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv14463
Plaintiff: STELIOS MANTALIS
Defendant: AUROBINDO PHARM, LTD., HETERO DRUGS LTD., HETERO LABS LTD. and others
In Re: VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASTELLO v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC et al
as 2:2023cv07341
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN CASTELLO
Defendant: JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC and others
In Re: ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THERAVANCE BIOPHARMA R&D IP, LLC et al v. EUGIA PHARMA SPECIALITIES LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv06667
Plaintiff: THERAVANCE BIOPHARMA R&D IP, LLC, THERAVANCE BIOPHARMA US, INC., THERAVANCE BIOPHARMA IRELAND LIMITED and others
Defendant: EUGIA PHARMA SPECIALITIES LTD., EUGIA US LLC, AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. and others
Counter Claimant: LUPIN INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
SHANNON et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv04229
Plaintiff: STANLEY SHANNON and NELLIE F. LAWLER-SHANNON
Defendant: AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD., MYLAN LABORATORIES, LTD., MYLAN N.V. and others
In Re: VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Abbott Laboratories, et al
as 23-2412
Petitioner: In re: ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ABBVIE INC, ABBVIE PRODUCTS LLC and others
Respondent: KING DRUG CO OF FLORENCE INC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP, AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP and others
OWSINSKI v. AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01340
Plaintiff: KRISTIN I. OWSINSKI
Defendant: AMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, MYLAN INC, MYLAN LABORATORIES LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
WILLIAMS v. AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv03909
Plaintiff: KENNETH W. WILLIAMS
Defendant: AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD., MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD., MYLAN N.V. and others
In Re: VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2217
Not Classified By Court: In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee: UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2214
Not Classified By Court: In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and others
Appellant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee: TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND
In re: In re: Sensipar Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Tablets
as 23-2215
Not Classified By Court: In re: SENSIPAR CINACALCET HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: CESAR CASTILLO LLC, KPH HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC and TEAMSTERS WESTERN REGION & LOCAL 177 HEALTH CARE PLAN
Appellant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, WATSON LABORATORIES INC, ACTAVIS PHARMA INC and others
Appellee: UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 RETIREES BENEFIT FUND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?