Cases 11 - 20 of 26
JONES v. TEXAS - U.S. PRISONS
as 2:2013cv00306
Plaintiff:
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Defendant:
TEXAS - U.S. PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaime Luevano v. Governor of Texas, et al
as 12-4624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAIME LUEVANO
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL TEXAS, SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS and others
LUEVANO v. PERRY et al
as 2:2012cv05602
Petitioner:
JAIME LUEVANO
Respondent:
RICK PERRY, GREG ABBOTT, TEXAS SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 1:2012cv00496
Defendant:
Timothy F. Geithner, Nancy D. Hogan, Bureau of Labor Statistics and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. TEH STATE GOVERNMENT - AGENCY OF TEXAS & U.S. et al
as 2:2011cv01629
Plaintiff:
ELVIS WAYNE JONES
Defendant:
THE STATE GOVERNMENT - AGENCY OF TEXAS & U.S. and THE TEXAS TDCJ-ID INMATE TRUST FUND ACCOUNTS OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAADHIO v. STATES OF NEW JERSEY AND TEXAS
as 3:2011cv07120
Petitioner:
RANDY BAADHIO
Respondent:
STATES OF NEW JERSEY AND TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jaime Luevano v. Rick Perry, et al
as 11-3205
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAIME LUEVANO
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK PERRY, TEXAS GOVERNOR and ATTY GEN TX, GREG ABBOTT
Debtor - Appellee:
SUPREME CT OF TX
Luevano v. Perry et al
as 1:2011cv00541
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Respondent:
Rick Perry, Greg Abbott and Texas Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
FAVORS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2011cv02750
Plaintiff:
DUJUAN A. FAVORS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF TEXAS, DEE EUBANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv00905
Plaintiff:
Adrian S. Holmes
Defendant:
H Lappin, Kathleen, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
