Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Flores v. US Department of Justice et al
as 5:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Texas Department of Corrections and US Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendley v. Texas Department of Corrections
as 3:2020cv03343
Plaintiff:
Tresley T Hendley
Defendant:
Texas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Sowell v. Mark Barber, et al
as 20-20519
Defendant / Appellee:
Niya W. Collins, John Doe, nurse, Chancy Sessions and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Sowell
Davis v. Texas Department of Corrections
as 9:2020cv00179
Respondent:
Texas Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Andre Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pacheco et al v. Texas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00796
Plaintiff:
Carlos Munoz, Luis M. Pacheco, Lazarraus Shaw and others
Defendant:
Texas Department of Corrections, State Jail Facilites and State Jail Facilities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardin v. Texas Department of Corrections, LeBlanc Unit
as 1:2019cv00510
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hardin
Defendant:
Warden Texas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardin v. Texas Department of Corrections, LeBlanc Unit
as 6:2019cv00471
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hardin
Defendant:
Warden Texas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen Askew v. Bryan Collier et al
as 3:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
Allen T. Askew
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza and Texas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Cerliano et al
as 6:2019cv00028
Plaintiff:
Sederick Von Lee
Defendant:
Maxey Cerliano and Texas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Texas Department of Corrections
as 3:2018cv01097
Plaintiff:
Willie Howard Andrews, Jr
Defendant:
Texas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
