Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(PC) Quang v. CSP California Medical Facility
as 2:2022cv01703
Plaintiff:
Thanh Quang
Defendant:
CSP California Medical Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Quang v. Alamosa et al
as 2:2022cv01704
Plaintiff:
Thanh Quang
Defendant:
S. Alamosa and California Medical Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Quang v. CSP California Medical Facility
as 2:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Thanh Quang
Defendant:
CSP California Medical Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01700
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01701
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01699
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
I.S.B. et al v. State of South Dakota Commissioner of Administration et al
as 4:2010cv04142
Plaintiff:
I.S.B., Willie Reed, IV, Thanh Quang Ngo and others
Defendant:
State of South Dakota Commissioner of Administration, South Dakota Department of Revenue & Regulations, South Dakota Bureau of Personell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quang v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2008hc02144
Petitioner:
Ho Thanh Quang
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Voung et al v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
as 1:2008cv01247
Plaintiff:
Thanh Quang Voung, Nai Truong and Asian Market
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
