Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hurt v. US, et al
as 22-1508
Plaintiff / Appellant: TYRONE HURT
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES and AMERICAN COLLEGE DISCIPLINARY
Hurt v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10423
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hurt
Defendant: United States of America and The American College Disciplinary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Family Planning Ass'n of Maine, et al v. US Dep't of Health & Hum Svcs, et al
as 20-1781
Defendant / Appellee: ALEX MICHAEL AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Interested Party: MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients, doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING and J DOE, DO, MPH, individually and on behalf of Dr. Doe's patients
Plaintiff: SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
McQueen Saba v. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
as 1:2020cv10408
Defendant: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Plaintiff: Timoria McQueen Saba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Family Planning Ass'n of Maine, et al v. US Dep't of Health & Hum Svcs, et al
as 19-1836
Defendant / Appellee: ALEX MICHAEL AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Interested Party: MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: J DOE, DO, MPH, individually and on behalf of Dr. Doe's patients, FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING and FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE, on behalf of itself, its staff, and its patients, doing business as MAINE FAMILY PLANNING
Plaintiff: SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00100
Defendant: DIANE FOLEY, MD, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff: J DOE, DO, MPH, FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF MAINE and SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hispanic American College, Inc. et al v. Caribbean Craftmatic Contour
as 3:2016cv01659
Plaintiff: Hispanic American College, Inc. , Richard Thompson and Samuel Santos
Defendant: Caribbean Craftmatic Contour, Jane Doe and Conjugal Partnership Santos-Doe
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
ERROR-NOT USED
as 3:2016cv01559
Plaintiff: Hispanic American College, Inc., Richard Thompson and Samuel Santos
Defendant: Caribbean Craftmatic Contour, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
The American College of Veteri v. Homecoming Farm, Inc., et al
as 14-1352
Plaintiff - Appellant: HOMECOMING FARM, INC. and SHEILA LYONS
Defendant: ROBERT GILLETTE, LINDA BLYTHE, HILARY CLAYTON and others
Defendant - Appellee: AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SPORTS MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, INC.
Homecoming Farm, Inc., et al v. American Veterinary Medical As, et al
as 14-1302
Plaintiff - Appellant: HOMECOMING FARM, INC. and SHEILA LYONS
Defendant: ROBERT GILLETTE, LINDA BLYTHE, HILARY CLAYTON and others
Defendant - Appellee: AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SPORTS MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?