Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 420
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Zaerpour v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv09680
Plaintiff: Soheil Zaerpour
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank, Bank of America, UBS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Davis v. Citizens Bank, N.A.
as 21-2071
Plaintiff: Regina C. Davis
Plaintiff / Appellant: Edward F. Davis
Defendant / Appellee: Citizens Bank, N.A. and Citizens One Home Loans
Defendant: Citizens Financial Group Inc., CCO Mortgage Corp., Royal Bank of Scotland and others
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3775
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co., HSBC Holdings PLC, Lloyds Banking Group PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: Societe Generale, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. and Barclays Bank PLC
Intervenor: California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3626
Defendant: Rabobank Group, Citigroup Global Markets Japan, Inc., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Defendant / Appellee: Deutsche Bank AG, RBS Securities Japan Limited, R.P. Martin Holdings Limited and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Intervenor: California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
McCarthy et al v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv05832
Plaintiff: Brenda Davis, Pamela Faust, Sondra Russell and others
Defendant: Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Coperatieve Rabobank U.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
In re: Bernard L. Madoff Inves
as 20-2291
Intervenor: Securities Investor Protection Corporation
Respondent: Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC,
Petitioner: ABN AMRO Bank, N.V., AKA The Royal Bank of Scotland N.V.
Davis et al v. Citizens Bank, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05584
Defendant: Citizens Bank, N.A., Citizens Financial Group Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland and others
Plaintiff: Regina C. Davis and Edward F. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE: ICE LIBOR ANTITRUST LIT
as 20-1492
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Livonia Retiree Health amd Disability Benefits Plan, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Annuity Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant / Appellee: Merill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., MUFG Bank, Ltd., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Amicus Curiae: American Antitrust Institute
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America Corporation
as 20-1086
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Nomura Holdings Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland plc and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: County of Washington, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Portigon AG and others
Plaintiff: County of Beaver, Pennsylvania, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Magnolia Regional Health Center, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH, on behalf of UNIQA Dollar Bond and others
Appellant: Fortinbras Asset Management GmbH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?