Cases 1 - 10 of 12
EDMOND v. WEXFORD HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
JAMARR EDMOND
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH, NOE MARANDET, K. MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. ACKERS et al
as 2:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
ACKERS, ERIC HILL, DOWNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barlag v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cortez Barlag and Daniel Cortez Butcher-Barlag
Defendant:
David J. Gladieux, Sickafoose, C. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Landsman et al
as 3:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Joshua Angel Flores
Defendant:
Landsman, Cordell, Osterday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTCHER v. CLERK, PUTNAM COUNTY, INDIANA
as 2:2021cv00422
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BUTCHER
Defendant:
CLERK, PUTNAM COUNTY, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLEDSOE v. COX et al
as 1:2019cv00212
Defendant:
C.O. Butcher, Major DUANE BURGESS, C.O. Kendall and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle R Bledsoe and KYLE R. BLEDSOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodgin v. Hake et al
as 1:2017cv00322
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hodgin
Defendant:
Clinton Hake, David Gladieux and Officer Butcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANIES v. ARVANTIS et al
as 1:2015cv01977
Defendant:
GEORGE ARVANITIS, KEVIN BUTCHER, SCOTT KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff:
WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
McClung v. Stefanatos et al
as 1:2010cv00218
Plaintiff:
Maurice Allen McClung
Defendant:
Mark Stefanatos, John Kauffman, Brian Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
