Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Lyons v. Kibideaux et al
as 1:2016cv00191
Plaintiff:
Guy Cornell Lyons
Defendant:
FNU Kibideaux, City of Beaumont and Gaylyn Leon Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rountree v. Dyson et al
as 1:2016cv00026
Defendant:
Troy Dyson and City of Beaumont
Plaintiff:
Landry Rountree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. City of Beaumont, Texas
as 1:2015cv00201
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
City of Beaumont, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cane v. The City of Beaumont Police Department
as 1:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Tyrell M Cane
Defendant:
The City of Beaumont Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Heilman v. Jefferson County, et al
as 15-40010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC HEILMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERSON COUNTY, CITY OF BEAUMONT, TOM MANESS and others
Morris v. The City of Beaumont-Beaumont Police Department
as 1:2014cv00681
Plaintiff:
Raymond Joseph Morris
Defendant:
The City of Beaumont-Beaumont Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heilman v. Jefferson County et al
as 1:2014cv00264
Plaintiff:
Eric Heilman
Defendant:
Jefferson County , City of Beaumont , Beaumont Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
White v. City of Beaumont et al
as 1:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Joseph W White
Defendant:
City of Beaumont and Chase Welch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Eric Blount v. City of Beaumont, et al
as 14-40084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC ARNOLD BLOUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BEAUMONT, SHARAE N. BASSETT, in her official capacity as City Attorney, BRYAN THOMAS BAKER, in his official capacity and others
Mackey et al v. City of Beaumont et al
as 1:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
Paul Mackey and Hope Antoine
Defendant:
City of Beaumont , City of Beaumont Public Health Department , Oliver Marion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
