Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Alliance to Save the Mattaponi, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 09-5221
Plaintiff - Appellant: Alliance to Save the Mattaponi, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. and Sierra Club, Virginia Chapter
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee: Carl T. Lone Eagle Custalow, Chief and Mattaponi Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee: United States Army Corps of Engineers, William T. Grisoli, in his official capacity as Brigadier General, Commander and Division Engineer of the U.S. Corps of Engineers, Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: City of Newport News, Virginia
Alliance to Save the Mattaponi, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 09-5222
Plaintiff - Appellee: Alliance to Save the Mattaponi, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. and Sierra Club, Virginia Chapter
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellant: Carl T. Lone Eagle Custalow, Chief and Mattaponi Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee: United States Army Corps of Engineers, William T. Grisoli, in his official capacity as Brigadier General, Commander and Division Engineer of the U.S. Corps of Engineers, Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: City of Newport News, Virginia
Alliance to Save the Mattaponi, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 09-5201
Plaintiff - Appellee: Alliance to Save the Mattaponi, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. and Sierra Club, Virginia Chapter
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee: Carl T. Lone Eagle Custalow and Mattaponi Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, William T. Grisoli, in his official capacity as Brigadier General, Commander and Division Engineer of the U.S. Corps of Engineers, Lisa Perez Jackson, in her official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: City of Newport News, Virginia
Brooks v. City of Newport News, Virginia et al
as 2:2009cv00174
Plaintiff: Anthony Eugene Brooks
Defendant: City of Newport News, Virginia and Newport News, Virginia Police Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kelvin Gould v. Newport News Circuit Court We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-8437
Plaintiff - Appellant: KELVIN GOULD
Defendant - Appellee: NEWPORT NEWS CIRCUIT COURT, OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR THE CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA, ALEXANDER LEVY and others
Hampton v. Commonwealth of Virginia, In the Circuit Court for the City of Newport News, Virginia
as 1:2008cv00581
Petitioner: James Hampton
Respondent: Commonwealth of Virginia, In the Circuit Court for the City of Newport News, Virginia
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anthony Brooks v. City of Newport News, Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6143
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY EUGENE BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA, NEWPORT NEWS POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEVIN CHRISTOPHER HARTIAN, Agent / Policer and others
Brooks v. The City of Newport News, Virginia et al
as 2:2007cv00574
Plaintiff: Anthony Eugene Brooks
Defendant: The City of Newport News, Virginia, The Newport News, VA. Police Department, Kevin Christopher Hartian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kitchen et al v. The City of Newport News, Virginia
as 4:2007cv00111
Plaintiff: Robert Kitchen, Robert Kitchen, Richard A. Angel and others
Defendant: The City of Newport News, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Kitchen et al v. The City of Newport News, Virginia
as 4:2007cv00111
Plaintiff: Robert Kitchen, Robert Kitchen, Marion B. Arrowood and others
Defendant: The City of Newport News, Virginia
Petitioner: Margaret Baker and Margaret Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?