Cases 21 - 30 of 137
BOYD v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00344
Plaintiff:
SCOTT DANIEL BOYD
Defendant:
T.J. WATSON, GARLAND MERRICK and DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STANLEY v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2021cv00332
Petitioner:
ALLEN D. STANLEY
Respondent:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRAZIL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2021cv00322
Plaintiff:
STANLEY THOMAS BRAZIL, JR.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SNOWDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00299
Plaintiff:
OREN SNOWDEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, B. LAMMER, J DEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COLLINS v. WARDEN
as 2:2021cv00278
Petitioner:
MARVIN COLLINS
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PRESSLEY et al v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00202
Plaintiff:
NIJUL ALEXANDER, JAMES R. PRESSLEY, AMIN RICKER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAFFER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00176
Defendant:
WILLIAM WILSON, KRUEGER, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. TRUMP ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT INCITEMENT OF INSURRECTION AT U.S.CAPITOL et al
as 1:2021cv00276
Respondent:
SEKOU MAAT, DESIGNATION AND SENTENCE COMPUTATION CENTER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STRONG v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00051
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE, EMPLOYEES, CORRECTIONS OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ABOUHALIMA v. LOTTS et al
as 2:2021cv00029
Defendant:
LOTTS, BUCKLE, CLINT SWIFT and others
Plaintiff:
MAHMUD ABOUHALIMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
