Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bey v. Evergy Metro Inc, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Marquette Lumumba Mugabe Bey
Defendant:
Evergy Metro Inc, Missouri, Spire Energy, KC Water and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Johnson et al v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Barbara Johnson, Nicole Price, Narene Crosby and others
Defendant:
Michael L. Parson, Andrew Bailey, Jay Ashcroft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Henderson v. KC Willow Creek LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Denise Henderson
Defendant:
KC Willow Creek LLC and Metro Public Safety & Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Phillips v. Public Safety et al
as 4:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Public Safety, Metro Transit Agency and Sam Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curless v. Evergy Metro, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M Curless
Defendant:
Evergy Metro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Hines et al
as 4:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Dexter D. Lewis
Defendant:
Michael Hines and St. Louis Metro Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
