Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lynn v. Ohio State University Medical Center et al
as 2:2009cv00907
Plaintiff:
Arthur Eugene Lynn
Defendant:
Ohio State University Medical Center, John Doe and Jane Doe, R.N.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Fussell et al v. Wilkinson et al
as 1:2003cv00704
Plaintiff:
Rodney Fussell , Gary Roberts and James Love
Defendant:
Reginald Wilkinson , Kay Northrup , Bruce Martin and others
Movant:
David L Easley and Daniel Wilson
Objector:
Brentley Buchele , Cora McNally , Ohio State University Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fan, M.D. v. Segal et al
as 1:2009cv11295
Plaintiff:
Lisha Fan, M.D.
Defendant:
David J. Segal, Deborah Toomey, Eun Sil Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henricks v. Pickaway Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2008cv00580
Plaintiff:
John Henricks
Defendant:
Pickaway Correctional Institution, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Corrections Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
