Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Beverly Sevcik, et al v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 12-17668
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ALASKA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF IDAHO; STATE OF MONTANA; STATE OF NEBRASKA; STATE OF OKLAHOMA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; and STATE OF UTAH, COLAGE, HAWAII PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAREN CAFFERATA-JENKINS, GREG FLAMER, SARA GEIGER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN E. SANDOVAL, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Nevada, AMY HARVEY, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Washoe County, Nevada, DIANA ALBA, in her official capacity as the County Clerk and Commissioner of Civil Marriages for Clark County, Nevada and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
COALITION FOR THE PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff:
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union et al v. Corey, et al
as 1:2009cv02234
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, Redwood County Minnesota Corn and Soybeans Growers, Penny Newman Grain, Inc. and others
Defendant:
James N. Goldstene, Mary D. Nichols, Daniel Sperling and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Oregon, Brazillian Sugar Cane Industry Association (UNICA), Oregon Petroleum Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE STEC, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 8:2009cv01304
Plaintiff:
Fred Jean, Keith Johnson, The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jonathan Fischer, Arman Rashtchi, Keith A Ovitt and others
Petitioner:
The Firefighters' Pension System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri Trust, Building Trades United Pension Pension Trust Fund and Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103 I.B.E.W., STEC, Inc. Investor Group and others
Defendant:
Stec Inc, Manouch Moshayedi, Mark Moshayedi and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Raymond D Cook, J P Morgan Securities Inc, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc and others
Interested Party:
Mark Berry and Jordan Grayson
Intervenor:
West Virginia Laborers Trust Fund
Davis v. Miller et al
as 4:2009cv00403
Plaintiff:
Larry Lynn Davis
Defendant:
Connie Miller, United States Government, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The State of California et al v. Winbond Electronics Co.
as 3:2007cv02589
Plaintiff:
The State of California, The State of Alaska, The State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Winbond Electronics Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01347
Plaintiff:
State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
