Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Wiggins et al v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01964
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc. and Unilever United States, Inc. doing business as Dove
Plaintiff:
REBECCA TORRES and CRAIG WIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Falborn v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 7:2020cv04138
Plaintiff:
Joyce Falborn
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Straw v. Wolters Kluwer United States
as 20-1507
Defendant / Appellee:
Lisa G. Lerman, Robert Rubinson, Wolters Kluwer United States Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrew U.D. Straw
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03251
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Corporate Leasing Associates, Inc. v. Lenovo (United States), Inc.
as 2:2019cv06856
Defendant:
Lenovo (United States), Inc.
Plaintiff:
Corporate Leasing Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Corporate Leasing Associates, Inc. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.
as 1:2019cv06856
Defendant:
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
Plaintiff:
Corporate Leasing Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hidalgo v. Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, Inc.
as 1:2019cv10545
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hidalgo
Defendant:
Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Stewart III v. Unilever United States, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05993
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc. and Conopco, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Bryce Stewart III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
