Cases 1 - 10 of 14,827
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Vargas v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2024cv01901
Plaintiff:
Rosa Vargas
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Nava-Capilla v. Garland
as 24-9534
Petitioner:
ANTONIO NAVA-CAPILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Reyes-Chavarria v. Garland
as 24-1315
Petitioner:
KENIA JOLIBETH REYES-CHAVARRIA, ALLAN OMAR RUIZ-REYES and KENIA FLORIDALMA RUIZ-REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Morales Alarcon v. Garland
as 24-1323
Petitioner:
HECTOR MARCIAL MORALES ALARCON
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Toj-Riz v. Garland
as 24-9533
Petitioner:
SANTIAGO TOJ-RIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
In Re: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb
as 24-1318
Appellant:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS, Trust
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Janczuk v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03761
Plaintiff:
Weronika E.K. Janczuk
Defendant:
United States of America, Executive Office for United States Attorneys and US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Moss v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Dena Lashonda Moss
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
