Cases 1 - 10 of 84
N'Jai v. The United State of America: Government et al
as 1:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn B. N'Jai
Defendant:
The United State of America: Government, The Pittsburgh Board of Public Education, Public School Employees Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Cahill v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv13899
Plaintiff:
Patrick Sean Cahill
Defendant:
The United States of America, Central Intelligence Agency, Dept of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Cina v. Cemex, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
James Cina
Defendant:
Cemex, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ruilova et al v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kaity Ruilova and Eileen Brannigan
Defendant:
Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc., Board of Directors of Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc., Investment Oversight Committee of the Yale-New Haven Hospital and Tax Exempt Affiliates Tax Sheltered Annuity Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Hospital Association and Association of American Medical Colleges
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Laliberte et al v. Quanta Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv03290
Plaintiff:
Mary Laliberte and Marie McKnight
Defendant:
Quanta Services, Inc., The Board of Trustees of Quanta Services, Inc. and The Quanta Services, Inc. 401(K) Savings Plan Committee
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Baumeister et al v. Exelon Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv06505
Plaintiff:
Fred Baumeister, Kenneth Berkeihiser, Dwayne Clauser and others
Defendant:
Exelon Corporation, Investment Oversight Committee, Board of Directors of Exelon Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Amicus Curiae the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Bracalente et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv04417
Plaintiff:
Robert Bracalente and Boris Gdalevich
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc., The Board of Trustees of Cisco Systems, Inc. and The Administrative Committee of the Cisco Systems, Inc. 401(K) Plan
Amicus Curiae:
American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee, American Retirement Association and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Kistler et al v. Stanley Black & Decker Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lang and James Kistler
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker Inc, The Board of Trustees of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., The Administrative Committee of the Stanley Black & Decker Retirement Account Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee, American Retirement Association and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Michelle Mills et al v. Molina Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01813
Plaintiff:
Michelle Mills, Coy Sarell, Chad Westover and others
Defendant:
Molina Healthcare, Inc., John Does, The Board of Directors of Molina Healthcare, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Luckett v. Wintrust Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv03968
Plaintiff:
Lynetta Luckett
Defendant:
Wintrust Financial Corporation, The Board of Trustees of Wintrust Financial Corp., The Administrative Committee of the Wintrust Financial Corp. Retirement Savings Plan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
