Cases 1 - 10 of 1,303
Benjamin Carter v. Virginia Department of Corrections Director
as 24-7205
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN FORREST CARTER
Respondent:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
John Gaskins v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-7164
Petitioner:
JOHN CORNELIUS GASKINS
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Riley Biro v. Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
as 24-7146
Petitioner:
RILEY DYSON BIRO
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Crosby v. Turner et al
as 7:2024cv00845
Defendant:
K. Sykes, Ramey, M. Trent and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Crosby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Lassiter, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-7132
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
RANDY LEE LASSITER, JR.
Larry Patterson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-7135
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
LARRY EDWIN PATTERSON
Quinten Parrish v. Harold Clarke
as 24-7097
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir. of Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
QUINTEN D. PARRISH
Collins v. Portsmouth Circuit Court et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Defendant:
Portsmouth Circuit Court and Virginia Department Of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Donta Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Carl Gordon v. Rena Mullins
as 24-6989
Defendant:
K. COUNTS, Correctional Officer of Virginia Department of Corrections, KIM CROWDER-AUSTIN, Regional Ombudsman for the Western Region of the Virginia Department of Corrections, RENA I. MULLINS, Institutional Ombudsman and others
Plaintiff:
CARL D. GORDON
Estes v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00711
Defendant:
Melvin Davis, Virginia Department of Corrections, Wendy Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
