Cases 1 - 10 of 1,629
Murphy v. Dalke et al
as 3:2024cv50180
Plaintiff:
John J. Murphy
Defendant:
Lt. Dalke, Lt. Remers and Warden Of Dixon C.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50176
Plaintiff:
Dan Smith
Defendant:
Director Latoya Hughes, Warden Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
See v. Warden
as 3:2024cv01239
Plaintiff:
Robert Benjamin See
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Woodside et al
as 3:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Darrion Brown
Defendant:
Lt Woodside, C/O Cook, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01176
Petitioner:
Benjamin Godwin Swanson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Anderson v. Facility Dixon C.C. et al
as 3:2024cv50173
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
Facility Dixon C.C., Construction Trade Worker, Contract Incorporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2024cv50161
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Warden Gonzales, Andre Matevousian, Timothy Moisant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Annamalia Annamalai
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USA, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Njus v. Warden McClean County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv01154
Petitioner:
Joel Njus
Respondent:
Warden McClean County Detention Center
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
