Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Rivens-Baker v. Lambert
as 24-20141
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
James Lambert, Jr., Fomijang Claude, Mathew McNeil and others
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy
as 8:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy Masked Guards
as 8:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy Masked Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin M. De Hoog v. Masked Guards of Theo Lacy Strip Search
as 8:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. De Hoog
Defendant:
Masked Guards of Theo Lacy Strip Search
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimner v. Stoney et al
as 2:2022cv02943
Plaintiff:
Audrey L. Kimner
Defendant:
Lori D. Stoney, Alex B. Cash, Suzanne Groft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Hoeltzel v. Margie Pillsbury, et al
as 22-1668
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK FRANKLIN HOELTZEL
Defendant / Appellee:
MARGIE PILLSBURY, Detective, MAUREEN BURKE, Officer, JANET MARTIN-CONNORS, Sergeant and others
Rivens-Baker Jr v. Larue et al
as 4:2022cv02480
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Rivens-Baker Jr
Defendant:
J. Larue, James Lambert, Jr., Fomijang Claude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Hoeltzel v. Lynetta Smith, et al
as 22-1261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK FRANKLIN HOELTZEL
Defendant / Appellee:
LYNETTA SMITH, MARGIE PILLSBURY, Detective, MAUREEN BURKE, Officer and others
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 22-55139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROUSER
Defendant / Appellee:
THEO WHITE, JAMES GOMEZ, Director of Corrections, J. YATES and others
Defendant:
E. W. MEADS, Protestant Chaplain, JACK R. REAGAN, Chief Inmate Appeal and JAMES E. TILTON
Zachary Castaneda v. Theo Lacy Facility et al
as 8:2021cv01960
Plaintiff:
Zachary Castaneda
Defendant:
Theo Lacy Facility and Orange County Jail-Intake RLS Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
