Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Therese Veronica Natty v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2014cv08839
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Attorney General Erick Holder, Jeh Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Therese Veronica Natty
Therese Natty v. Warden, et al
as 14-14155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERESE VERONICA NATTY
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, ASSISTANT WARDEN PETTERSON, LT. T. BROWN and others
Therese Natty v. Jailer Officer Morgan, et al
as 14-14154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERESE VERONICA NATTY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAILER OFFICER MORGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BAGGARD, SHERIFF STEVE CRONIC and others
Therese Natty v. Warden, et al
as 14-13791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERESE VERONICA NATTY
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, ASSISTANT WARDEN PETTERSON, LT. T. BROWN and others
Therese Natty v. Jailer Officer Morgan, et al
as 14-13794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERESE VERONICA NATTY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAILER OFFICER MORGAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BAGGARD, SHERIFF STEVE CRONIC and others
Therese Natty v. Barbara Walrath, et al
as 12-13726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERESE VERONICA NATTY
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA WALRATH, TAMEEKA MITCHELL and TERESA EADY
Natty, et al v. Cronic et al
as 2:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
Therese Veronica Natty and Daughter Rammaine F.D. Landella
Defendant:
Steve Cronic, Bandy, Seymour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Natty v. Morgan et al
as 2:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
Therese Veronica Natty
Defendant:
Morgan, Baggard, Steve Cronic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Natty v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
Therese Veronica Natty
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Homeland Security and Ariel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Natty v. Stone et al
as 2:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
Therese Veronica Natty
Defendant:
Stacey U. Stone, U. Joseph, Lance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
