Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Nguyen, et al. v. City of Garden Grove, et al.
as 24-189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON NGUYEN, NGOC LE THI PHAN and HOANG MINH NGUYEN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, MARK LORD, MICHAEL REYNOLDS and others
The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak, BNSF Railway Company, MS Contracting, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Phan v. Department of Homeland Security, The et al
as 1:2022cv01604
Plaintiff:
My Thi Phan
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, The, USCIS, Secretary of the DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Xuan Phan v. Jetblue Airways Corporation
as 18-16429
Plaintiff - Appellee:
XUAN THI PHAN
Defendant - Appellant:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Phan v. Jetblue Airways Corporation
as 2:2016cv02328
Defendant:
Jetblue Airways Corporation
Plaintiff:
Xuan Thi Phan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maxum Indemnity Company v. Wagon Wheel Flea Market, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00785
Plaintiff:
Maxum Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Wagon Wheel Flea Market, Inc. and Thong Thi Phan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011at01397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02592
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
