Cases 1 - 10 of 185
Jones v. State of California
as 23-3749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS DEAN JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Delia Lujan v. Western Flyer Express, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
Delia Lujan
Defendant:
Western Flyer Express, LLC, Thomas Lavelle Jones and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Auto Negligence
Robert F. Napier v. Western Flyer Express LLC et al
as 5:2023cv02217
Plaintiff:
Robert Napier
Defendant:
Western Flyer Express, LLC, Thomas Lavelle Jones, Western Flyer Express LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Delia Lujan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Auto Negligence
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06313
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BLAKE JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones, Jr. v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv05386
Plaintiff:
Thomas L Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Jones v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04197
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Jones
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Renfro Multifamily Properties LP et al
as 3:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Dana Bowman
Defendant:
Renfro Multifamily Properties LP, Huffman Contractors Inc, Stephen M Eisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Jones v. Montgomery County Jail
as 3:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Jones
Respondent:
Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
