Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Moore v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kevin Moore
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00386
Defendant:
Davol Inc, C R BARD and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
CARSTAR Franchisor SPV LLC v. Collision Express of Ohio, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03282
Defendant:
COLLISION EXPRESS OF OHIO, INC., CARSTAR COLUMBUS, INC., Thomas G Moore and others
Plaintiff:
CARSTAR FRANCHISOR SPV LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Moore v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2015cv02659
Petitioner:
Thomas M. Moore
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Killion, et al v. KeHE Distributor
as 13-4340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS E. KILLION, an individual on behalf of himself and others similary situated, BRION P. HALEY, an individual on behalf of himself and others similary situated, BARNEY DOLAN, an indivual on behalf of himself and other similary situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEHE DISTRIBUTORS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv11789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas Killion, et al v. KeHE Distributor
as 13-3357
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS E. KILLION, an individual on behalf of himself and others similary situated, BRION P. HALEY, an individual on behalf of himself and others similary situated, BARNEY DOLAN, an indivual on behalf of himself and other similary situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KEHE DISTRIBUTORS
Moore v. Fulgenzi et al
as 2:2013cv10010
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gerald Moore
Defendant:
Matthew Fulgenzi and Brian Headapohl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
