Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bailey v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Bailey
Defendant:
United States of America, National Institute of allergy & Infectious Diseases, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Andy Aaron et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04992
Plaintiff:
Barbara Bienvenue, Andy Aaron, Erlinda Acosta and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Thomas Bailey v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 21-80061
Petitioner:
RITE AID CORPORATION
Respondent:
THOMAS BAILEY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Dwayne Frank Thomas Bailey-v-Nancy A. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00824
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Frank Thomas Bailey
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Bailey v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 4:2018cv06926
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bailey
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey et al v. Cordis Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv07281
Plaintiff:
Michael Dailey , Thomas Bailey , Curtis Holloway and others
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation and Confluent Medical Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. City of Redmond Oregon et al
as 6:2016cv01055
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Bailey
Defendant:
City of Redmond Oregon and Redmond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Bailey
as 1:2014at00646
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Thomas Bailey
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Bailey
as 1:2014cv01353
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Thomas Bailey
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Douglas Randall et al v. Citigroup Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00097
Defendant:
ACC Capital Holdings, Ameriquest Mortgage Corporation, Argent Mortgage and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Arcadi, Jaime Arce, Shila Ardalan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
