Cases 1 - 10 of 22
United States v. Richard Ball
as 25-3131
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard Thomas Ball
Ball v. United States of America
as 4:2025cv00423
Petitioner:
Richard Thomas Ball
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ball et al v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11831
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ball, William Bloom, Jose De La Luz and others
Defendant:
AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC., AMEREX CORPORATION, ARCHROMA U.S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ball v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2025cv00281
Plaintiff:
Emit-Thomas Ball
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma and City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States v. Richard Ball
as 23-3461
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Richard Thomas Ball
Protective Life Insurance Company v. Ball et al
as 5:2023cv00827
Plaintiff:
Protective Life Insurance Company
Cross Claimant:
Thomas Ball
Cross Defendant:
BancFirst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Sarrah Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04959
Plaintiff:
Alicia Breeden, Jessica Campbell, Sarrah Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00762
Plaintiff:
Sarrah Adams, Levi Allen, Kimberly Alverson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00762
Plaintiff:
Adams, Alicia Breeden, Jessica Campbell and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Ball v. TZ Containers, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ball
Defendant:
TZ Containers, LLC and Zachary Ball
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
