Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Brown v. Metzger, et al
as 1:2018cv00911
Petitioner:
Thomas Brown
Respondent:
Dana Metzger and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER et al
as 3:2018cv09606
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER, GLENN FERGUSON, PHD, MOISEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. USA
as 3:2016cv01238
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thomas Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BANKS et al v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2014cv00362
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS and RAFAEL CABRERA
Defendant:
MARK R. HORNAK, ERIC ROSEN, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Banks et al v. Hornak et al
as 1:2014cv00495
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Rafael Cabrera
Defendant:
Mark R. Hornak, Eric Rosen, David Hicton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv01673
Petitioner:
Brandon Thomas Brown
Respondent:
John Wetzel, Daniel Burns and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tormu Prall v. Supreme Court, et al
as 13-2313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT and others
DAVIS v. BROCADO et al
as 1:2013cv01133
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
PETER BROCADO, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR'S AND PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRALL v. SUPREME COURT et al
as 3:2011cv07004
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRALL v. SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2011cv07004
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
