Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HALEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20451
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HALEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 2:2023cv04917
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Baker, Elizabeth Hall, Evans Ehardt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Baker et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2023cv08033
Plaintiff:
Nancy Baker, Elizabeth Hall, Evans Ehardt and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
HALEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05035
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HALEY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv27376
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HALEY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Rome et al
as 2:2015cv01563
Plaintiff:
Damien Green
Defendant:
Erin E Rome, J Thomas Haley, Kevin J Palmersheim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chesapeake Bank v. Cullen et al
as 3:2010cv00247
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Bank
Defendant:
Joseph Gerry Cullen, Thomas Haley, Bernard Stromberg and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Haley v. BCB Homes, Inc.
as 2:2009cv00518
Plaintiff:
Thomas Haley
Defendant:
BCB Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
