Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thomas Lund et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv02772
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lund and June Anne Lund
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson and Johnson Services Inc , Thomas P Schmalzried and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas Lund et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv06528
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Does, Johnson and Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
June Anne Lund and Thomas Lund
Thomas Lund et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 5:2017cv01800
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Does, Johnson and Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
June Anne Lund and Thomas Lund
Core Property Capital, LLC et al v. Profor Securities, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Core Property Capital, LLC , Chad Lund , Thomas Lund and others
Defendant:
Profor Securities, LLC and Vito Milano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mudd et al
as 1:2011cv09202
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Daniel H. Mudd, Enrico Dallavecchia and Thomas Lund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gordon v. Ashley et al
as 1:2009cv01351
Plaintiff:
Hilda Gordon
Defendant:
Stephen B. Ashley, Daniel H. Mudd, Dennis R. Beresford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JESTEADT et al v. ASHLEY et al
as 2:2008cv01335
Plaintiff:
LEONARD JESTEADT and GRACE JESTEADT
Defendant:
STEPHEN B. ASHLEY, DANIEL H. MUDD, DENNIS R. BERESFORD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gordon v. Ashley et al
as 9:2008cv81007
Plaintiff:
Hilda Gordon
Defendant:
Stephen B. Ashley, Daniel H. Mudd, Dennis R. Beresford and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lund v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2007cv00577
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lund
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
