Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hoi Thi Huynh v. Board of Education of the City, et al
as 09-2794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOI THI HUYNH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHICAGO BOARD OF EDUCATION, CITY OF CHICAGO, ARNE DUNCAN and others
VERBANIK v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2009cv00448
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. VERBANIK
Defendant:
MICHEL HARLOW, FRED RUFFO, MICHEL SCHULLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Huynh v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv02007
Plaintiff:
Hoi Huynh
Defendant:
Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago, The City of Chicago, Arne Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carl Watson v. Thomas Mills
as 09-5356
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL WATSON
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS MILLS, Warden
Martin v. Little et al
as 3:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
Joe Martin
Defendant:
George M. Little, Thomas Mills, Alvin Minnick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Little et al
as 3:2008mc00295
Plaintiff:
Joe Martin
Defendant:
George M. Little, Thomas Mills, Alvin Minnick and others
Stagner v. Mills et al
as 2:2008cv02542
Petitioner:
Donald Stagner
Respondent:
Thomas Mills and John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MILLS v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv81200
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MILLS
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, ABER INSULATION, GRAVES-ABER INSULATION COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Paul Farnsworth v. Thomas Mills, et al
as 08-5345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL FARNSWORTH, aka Ronnie B. Bradfield
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS MILLS, Warden, LARRY SPAYS, Food Director, MICHAEL YOUNG, Asst. Food Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
