Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Stanley v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Stanley, Thomas Neeley, Dominick Garland and others
Defendant:
Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC, Dollar Tree Inc. doing business as Dollar Tree and Family Dollar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Neeley v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Thomas Neeley
Defendant:
Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Neeley v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC
as 2:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Thomas Neeley
Defendant:
Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Stanley v. Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Stanley
Defendant:
Zeroed-In Technologies, LLC, Dollar Tree, Inc., Dollar Tree, Inc. doing business as Dollar Tree and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Thomas Neeley, Dominick Garland, Phillis Pounds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Austin Clark v. Neeli Bendapudi, et al
as 22-5983
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUSTIN ROY CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
NEELI BENDAPUDI, President of the University of Louisville, in her official and individual capacities, LORI GONZALES, Executive Vice President and University Provost at the University of Louisville, in her official and individual capacities, TONI M. GANZEL, Executive Dean of the School of Health No. Medicine at the University of Louisville, in her official and individual capacities and others
Clark v. Bendapudi et al
as 3:2021cv00480
Plaintiff:
Austin Roy Clark
Defendant:
Neeli Bendapudi, Lori Gonzales, Toni M. Ganzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEELEY v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2008cv69826
Plaintiff:
THOMAS NEELEY
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO., AMERICAN OPITCAL CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
