Cases 1 - 7 of 7
OWENS v. ASTRAZENECA LP, et al
as 2:2022cv07127
Plaintiff:
THOMAS OWENS
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP,, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Thomas Owens, et al
as 15-2652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS OWENS, Detective, Johnstown Police Department, Individually and in his Official Capacity, BETH MCCONNELL, Caseworker, Childern and Youth Services, Individually and in her official Capacity, TINA HIPPLER, Caseworker for Childern and Youth Services, in her individual and official capacity and others
RAY v. OWENS et al
as 3:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR.
Defendant:
THOMAS OWENS, BETH MCCONNELL, TINA HIPPLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAMB et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05825
Plaintiff:
EVA LAMB , PATRICIA LAMBERT , JAMES A. LANCASTER and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION , SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOSEPH A. NICHOLS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVERETT et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv04953
Plaintiff:
JAMES EVERETT , RACHEL EVERETT , WILLIS THOMAS OWEN and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROZIER et al v. JOHNSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2009cv00327
Plaintiff:
DONNIE PAUL ROZIER, JR. and ROZIER ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
JOHNSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAPTIAN OF POLICE ANDREW FRAER, OFFICER CHAD MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OWENS v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76534
Plaintiff:
THOMAS OWENS
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
