Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Patterson v. Beard et al
as 3:2014cv02552
Petitioner:
Charles Thomas Patterson
Respondent:
Jeffrey A. Beard and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Gregory Emmanuel Williams
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections, Steve Lund, Curtis L. Garner and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Patterson et al
as 2:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jawann Lindsey
Defendant:
Thomas Patterson, FNU Bigelow, L. Busio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haas v. Patterson et al
as 2:2012cv01076
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jason Haas
Defendant:
Thomas Patterson and Alfred C. Bigelow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yoder v. Kirkpatrick, et al
as 12-4073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. YODER
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL KIRKPATRICK, PAULA COOK, RICHARD BROWN and others
Jex v. Utah County et al
as 2:2012cv00246
Plaintiff:
Michelle Jex
Defendant:
Utah County, Utah County Sheriff's Office, Jim Tracy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Patterson
as 1:2011cv00136
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ray Underwood
Respondent:
Thomas Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv01019
Petitioner:
Lloyd Thomas Patterson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Sibbett, et al
as 11-4060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL R. SIBBETT, DONALD E. BLANCHARD, CHERYL HANSEN and others
Yoder v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 2:2010cv00257
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Yoder
Defendant:
Paul Kirkpatrick, Paula Cook, Richard Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
