Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Perry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv01306
Plaintiff:
Dwight Thomas Perry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mitchell v. Magruder et al
as 6:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Defendant:
Andrew M. Magruder, Marty C. Allen, Dean Broome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cino v. Tarelton Manor Apartments, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv60336
Plaintiff:
Charles Cino
Defendant:
Tarelton Manor Apartments, Inc. , Ratliff Management Services, Inc. , Cary L Ratliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
PERRY v. KIMBERLING et al
as 2:2016cv02773
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PERRY
Defendant:
MICHAEL KIMBERLING , MARK 1, INC., RANDY DEITMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Wells v. Karen Miller, et al
as 15-15631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS PERRY WELLS
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN MILLER, 15th Judicial Circuit Court Palm Beach County, sued in their Official Capacities and NELSON BAILEY, 15th Judicial Circuit Court Palm Beach County, sued in their Official Capacities
Felton v. Surrogate Court et al
as 1:2015cv04139
Defendant:
Administration for Children Services, Aetna Life Insurance, James Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Felton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wells v. Miller et al
as 9:2015cv80412
Plaintiff:
Thomas Perry Wells
Defendant:
Karen Miller and Nelson Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felton et al v. Restoration et al
as 1:2015cv00400
Defendant:
AR&R Security, Adult Protective Service, James Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Felton, Jean Doar 1-100 and John Doar 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Perry v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv01028
Plaintiff:
Dwight Thomas Perry
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
