Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mack v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv00300
Defendant:
Assoc. Warden Jeffrey Butler, Lt. Kemmerer, Captain J. Rhodes and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Mack
Amicus Curiae:
Lt. Dallas Beachel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 3:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE , M. ROBINOWITZ , J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Kane et al
as 3:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane, Blake R. Davis, M. D. Caravajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
McCreary et al v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jusamuel Rodriguez McCreary , Richard C. Anamanya and Joseph R. Coppola
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Prisons, Thomas R. Kane and David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pratt v. Kane et al
as 3:2017cv00291
Petitioner:
Eugene Pratt
Respondent:
Thomas R. Kane , Michael Carvajal and Charles Maiorana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Njos v. Kane et al
as 3:2012cv01252
Plaintiff:
Scott Njos
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane, Doe 1 and 2, Romig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richardson v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2011cv02266
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Richardson
Defendant:
Bryan A Bledsoe, Thomas R. Kane, Joseph Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
McCall v. Kane et al
as 3:2011cv02136
Plaintiff:
Bondary McCall
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane and Ronnie Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woods v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2011cv01919
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Woods
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Staff Employees at the Bureau of Prisons, Thomas R. Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
