Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ALLEN v. THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BLAIR COUNTY
as 3:2021cv00103
Defendant:
THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BLAIR CO.
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
THOMAS-RAY v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00829
Plaintiff:
YVETTE THOMAS-RAY
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAY v. GANOE et al
as 3:2015cv00343
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY, III
Defendant:
VIOLETTE GANOE, SHARON SIMONE and John Manenti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAY v. GANOE et al
as 2:2015cv00650
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY, III
Defendant:
VIOLETTE GANOE, SHARON SIMONE and JOHN MANENTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ALLEN v. MAZURKIEWICZ et al
as 3:2011cv00190
Petitioner:
THOMAS RAY ALLEN
Respondent:
JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BLAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANDERSON v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2010cv01565
Petitioner:
THOMAS RAY ANDERSON
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, TOM CORBETT and MARK AARON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GORDON et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv85260
Plaintiff:
CHERLYN ANN GORDON, CHERLYN ANN GORDON, THOMAS RAY GORDON and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Benjey v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01068
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Benjey
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc. and On-Demand Publishing, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WITHERS et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv76827
Plaintiff:
THOMAS RAY WITHERS and LEANNE H. WITHERS
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
