Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Mason Lewis v. City of Manhattan Beach et al
as 2:2024cv03479
Plaintiff:
Mason Lewis
Defendant:
City of Manhattan Beach, Shawn Thompson, Steve Kitsios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brian Williams v. City of Hawthorne et al
as 2:2023cv06646
Defendant:
Doe Pabuelo, Doe Espinoza, M.D. Stephan T. Honda and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Reid et al
as 2:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Gregory J Reid and Pamela Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Blount County, Mark Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01065
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Oneonta, City of, Charles Clifton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROGERS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2020cv00370
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROGERS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. Grandview Medical Center et al
as 2:2017cv02185
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Grandview Medical Center, Lefferage Robbins, Jr and Jackie Jay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Schindler et al v. Rogers
as 2:2016cv06797
Defendant:
Dr. Thomas Rogers
Plaintiff:
Edwin D. Schindler and Meri L. Schindler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROGERS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2016cv08872
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROGERS
Defendant:
GERARD SMITH, MICHAEL DACHISEN, PETER KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROGERS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2016cv08870
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROGERS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and MAN WITH NJ STATE TROOPER ID 7789
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
