Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Jerome Dixon v. Thomas Watson
as 17-3252
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEROME DIXON
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS WATSON
Dixon v. Watson
as 1:2017cv01339
Petitioner:
Jerome Dixon
Respondent:
Thomas Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adkins v. Watson
as 1:2017cv01293
Petitioner:
Marchan Adkins
Respondent:
Thomas Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. Watson et al
as 1:2017cv01231
Plaintiff:
Bradley Scott Clark, Sr
Defendant:
Thomas Watson, Jeffrey Rendon, Sara M Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watson et al v. Northland Heating & Air Conditioning Co., Inc.
as 2:2017cv00447
Plaintiff:
Thomas Watson and Dashawn Goodwin
Defendant:
Northland Heating & Air Conditioning Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moyer v. SOUTHWEST PLUMBING SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv24827
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Moyer
Defendant:
SOUTHWEST PLUMBING SERVICES, INC. , THOMAS WATSON and PAUL ROACHE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Anthony Boyd v. Joe Driver, et al
as 16-41112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE D. DRIVER, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Three Rivers, PHILLIP CHILDS, Associate Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Three Rivers, MIKE DUNGAN, Associate Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Three Rivers and others
LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Caledonia Springs et al
as 2:2016mc00075
Defendant:
Caledonia Springs, Inc., Peter H. Chiang, Peter H. Chiang and others
Plaintiff:
LPP Mortgage Ltd., L.P.
Anthony Boyd v. Joe Driver, et al
as 16-40658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE D. DRIVER, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Three Rivers, PHILLIP CHILDS, Associate Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Three Rivers, MIKE DUNGAN, Associate Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Three Rivers and others
Watson v. Citigroup Inc.
as 2:2015cv00524
Plaintiff:
Thomas Watson
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
