Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Brandon Council v. Gina Sacchetti, et al
as 26-1772
Plaintiff:
BRANDON M. COUNCIL
Defendant:
GINA SACCHETTI, Doctor and THOMAS WATSON, Warden
WATSON v. PAULK
as 7:2026cv00035
Petitioner:
ALAN THOMAS WATSON
Respondent:
SHERIFF ASHLEY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2025cv08121
Plaintiff:
Thomas Watson
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Watson v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2025cv12371
Plaintiff:
Thomas Watson
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lathan v. Watson
as 3:2025cv01358
Petitioner:
Darryl Lathan
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mallory v. Watson
as 1:2025cv00142
Petitioner:
Victor L. Mallory, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv24317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv24313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Agbekponou et al v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2024cv02746
Plaintiff:
Dede Agbekponou and Tossou Hounnou
Defendant:
Andre Vaughn, C.R. England Inc., Thomas Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ferrari et al. v. Cuomo et al.
as 1:2023cv07715
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FERRARI, as Administrator of the Estate of CHRISTINE FERRARI, LEOVA JENKINS, as Administrator of the Estate of ELOISE BROOKS, IRASEMA RIVERA, as Administrator of the Estate of PAUL RIVERA and others
Defendant:
Ex-Governor ANDREW M. CUOMO, HOWARD A. ZUCKER, MELISSA DEROSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
