Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Makanas v. Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting) Inc.
as 4:2018cv00659
Plaintiff:
Theresita Makanas
Defendant:
Thomson Reuters and Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05448
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting) Inc. v. Homeactions, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03654
Plaintiff:
Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting) Inc.
Defendant:
Homeactions, LLC, Barry Friedman and Laurie Friedman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting), Inc. v. Vargas
as 2:2015cv11331
Plaintiff:
Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting), Inc.
Defendant:
Casilda Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navarre et al v. Ajilon LLC d/b/a Ajilon Consulting et al
as 4:2011cv02081
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Navarre , Amol Hardikar and Tia Williams
Defendant:
Ajilon LLC d/b/a Ajilon Consulting, Modis, Inc., Adecco USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting) Inc. v. Laas et al
as 1:2008cv00632
Plaintiff:
Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting) Inc., Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting) Inc. and Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting) Inc.
Defendant:
Steve Laas, Michael Cannon Lateur, Kevin L. Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
