Cases 1 - 10 of 15
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00913
Petitioner:
LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent:
BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent:
BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent:
BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
WALKER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JOHNSON, KENNETH WATKINS, JERICUO MISSOURI and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PENNINGTON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2019cv00796
Plaintiff:
TAMARA STOUT, RACHEL LAMBRIGHT, JOSEPH RICHARD, III and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Not Yet Classified:
HOWARD ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
THORNE v. MATTIS
as 1:2018cv02170
Defendant:
JAMES N. MATTIS
Plaintiff:
OTIS THORNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
THORNE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00282
Plaintiff:
ANGELA THORNE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
REAVES et al v. BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
as 1:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, SARAH SIMON-ARNOLD, ROGER ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
BLACK FARMERS ASSOCIATION SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
