Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Abney et al v. Gomez et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
James D. Abney, Benjamin Acuna, Gonzalo Erick Aguilar-Vargas and others
Defendant:
Christopher Gomez, Federal Correctional Institution McDowell, Colette S. Peters and others
Petitioner:
Antonio Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Federal Tort Claims Act - Disposition by Agency Req
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fields v. Lt. London et al
as 1:2020cv03039
Defendant:
Dr. Polynskee, Lt. V. Jones, Lt. Ripley and others
Plaintiff:
Marquise Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Coffee v. Officer Barnett et al
as 1:2019cv00326
Defendant:
Officer Barnett, Officer Banker and Officer Thornes
Plaintiff:
Eric Coffee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Guessford v. United States Of America
as 1:2018cv02984
Plaintiff:
Thorne Ashton Guessford
Defendant:
United States Of America
Kasprzyk v. Advanced Medical Management Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02103
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Kasprzyk
Defendant:
Charles Thorne, Larry Yalich and Advanced Medical Management Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bell v. Maryland Transporation Authority Police et al
as 1:2014cv04048
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bell
Defendant:
Maryland Transporation Authority Police , Colonel Kundrat and R. Thorne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv02488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thorne v. O'Sullivan et al
as 1:2014cv01423
Plaintiff:
Roy Thorne
Defendant:
Laura H.G. O'Sullivan, Community Development Administration, Bogman, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Thorne v. O'Sullivan et al
as 1:2014cv00987
Plaintiff:
Roy Thorne
Defendant:
Laura H.G. O'Sullivan, Community Development Administration, Bogman, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
