Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Guess v. Brown, as Richland County Administrator et al
as 3:2024cv01797
Plaintiff:
Thurmond Guess, Sr.
Defendant:
Leonardo Brown, Darrell Jackson, Sr., Rose Ann English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guess v. Coble as Richland County et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Thurmond Guess, Sr.
Defendant:
Daniel Coble as Richland County, Circuit Court, Morgan Stuart Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guess v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv06408
Plaintiff:
Thurmond Guess, Sr.
Defendant:
Leonardo Brown, Darrell Jackson, Sr., Rose Ann English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guess v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv02957
Plaintiff:
Thurmond Guess, Sr.
Defendant:
Leonardo Brown, Darrell Jackson, Sr., Rose Ann English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Farris et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02881
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Farris, Gregory Kelton, Patricio Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Armstrong v. Byrd et al
as 6:2022cv04208
Plaintiff:
Jerome Armstrong
Defendant:
Brandon Byrd, Vanessa Mitchell, Candice Jamison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
